Under what circumstance does a temporary abatement control method require a clearance inspection?

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $4.99 payment

Prepare for the CDPH Lead Inspector/Assessor California State Exam. Engage with flashcards, multiple choice questions, hints, and explanations. Get exam-ready!

A temporary abatement control method typically requires a clearance inspection only if conducted in response to childhood lead poisoning. This requirement is based on the necessity to ensure that any lead hazard control measures taken are effective and that the environment is safe for children. When lead-based hazards are addressed in homes or facilities where children reside, especially following cases of lead poisoning, it is crucial to verify that lead levels are reduced to safe thresholds before allowing occupants back into the space.

While inspections before work begins can help assess the extent of lead hazards, they do not determine the success of any abatement methods. Similarly, after work is completed, although a clearance inspection may be beneficial, it is specifically mandated in situations involving childhood lead poisoning to protect vulnerable populations.

Lastly, while facility repurposing could necessitate evaluations for lead safety, it is not a primary reason for requiring clearance inspections tied directly to temporary abatement methods. Therefore, the connection between temporary abatement due to childhood lead poisoning and the requirement for clearance inspections is essential for safeguarding public health.